GeForce Go 6200 vs GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 675M GTX 675M SLI GTX 675MX GTX 675MX Mac Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Go 6100 Go 6100 + nForce Go 430 Go 6150 Go 6150 + nForce Go 430 Go 6200 Go 6200 TE Go 6250 Go 6400 Go 6600 Go 6600 NPB 128M Go 6600 TE Go 6800 Go 6800 Ultra

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI and GeForce Go 6200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
8.48
+21100%

GTX 675M SLI outperforms Go 6200 by a whopping 21100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 675M SLI GTX 675M SLI
Go 6200 Go 6200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5051492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.980.18
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2NV44 A2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)1 February 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7687
Core clock speed620 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data75 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt16 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.200
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Valorant 80−85
+242%
24−27
−242%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+1322%
9−10
−1322%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Dota 2 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Valorant 80−85
+242%
24−27
−242%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Dota 2 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Valorant 80−85
+242%
24−27
−242%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 0−1
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
Valorant 90−95 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 30−33 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 675M SLI surpassed Go 6200 in all 30 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.48 0.04
Recency 6 January 2011 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 16 Watt

GTX 675M SLI has a 21100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 175% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
GeForce Go 6200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
Go 6200 GeForce Go 6200
vs
ATI Xpress 200M Radeon Xpress 200M
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
GT 755M SLI GeForce GT 755M SLI
HD 6970 HD 6970
vs
GTX 645 OEM GTX 645 OEM
HD 6970 HD 6970
vs
GT 240 GT 240
HD 6970 HD 6970
vs
GT 1030 DDR4 GT 1030 DDR4
HD 6970 HD 6970
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GT 1030 GK107
HD 6970 HD 6970
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile
GTX 675M SLI GTX 675M SLI
vs
550X Mobile 550X Mobile
GTX 765M SLI 765M SLI
vs
GTX 745 OEM 745 OEM
GTX 670MX SLI GTX 670MX SLI
vs
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
GTX 670MX SLI 670MX SLI
vs
RTX 2080 Super 2080 Super
GTX 480 GTX 480
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675M SLI or GeForce Go 6200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.