GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs GTX 670MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX and GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 670MX
2012
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.09
+226%

GTX 670MX outperforms GTX 660M Mac Edition by a whopping 226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking626968
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.672.15
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK104GK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960384
Core clock speed600 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0830.40
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+290%
10−12
−290%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Hitman 3 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+229%
14−16
−229%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Hitman 3 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how GTX 670MX and GTX 660M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX is 290% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.09 1.56
Recency 1 October 2012 1 April 2013
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 670MX has a 226.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 660M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 670MX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 51 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.