Quadro 6000 SDI vs GeForce GTX 670M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 622 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.64 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GF100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 (12 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $11,499 |
| Current price | $2.59 | $340 (0x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 336 | 448 |
| CUDA cores | 336 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 231 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro 6000 SDI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 248 mm |
| Width | no data | Quad-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video, 2x SDI |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| HDCP | + | no data |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 231 Watt |
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro 6000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 670M is a notebook card while Quadro 6000 SDI is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
