GeForce 9650M GT vs GTX 670

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	376	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.38	no data
Power efficiency	5.96	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GK104	G96C
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 May 2012 (12 years ago)	19 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	32
CUDA cores	1344	32
Core clock speed	915 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	980 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,540 million	314 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	23 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	109.8	8.800
Floating-point processing power	2.634 TFLOPS	0.0848 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	8
TMUs	112	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	241 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	256-bit GDDR5	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.0 GB/s	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	1920x1200
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	-
3D Gaming	+	-
3D Vision	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.2	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	10 May 2012	19 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	23 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---