GeForce GT 1030 vs GTX 660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GT 1030, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.21
+79.9%

GTX 660 Ti outperforms GT 1030 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking426585
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.132.31
Power efficiency5.2514.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK104GP108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 August 2012 (12 years ago)17 May 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 660 Ti has 35% better value for money than GT 1030.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344384
Core clock speed915 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate109.835.23
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS1.127 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs11224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length241 mm145 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR564 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 660 Ti 11.21
+79.9%
GT 1030 6.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660 Ti 4411
+79.9%
GT 1030 2452

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 660 Ti 8415
+78%
GT 1030 4728

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 660 Ti 23726
+17.5%
GT 1030 20192

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 660 Ti 5432
+49.9%
GT 1030 3625

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 660 Ti 37758
+71.1%
GT 1030 22069

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15347
+56.2%
GT 1030 9826

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 660 Ti 15564
+62.4%
GT 1030 9585

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 660 Ti 11274
+9.4%
GT 1030 10307

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+208%
25
−208%
1440p40−45
+60%
25
−60%
4K16−18
+60%
10
−60%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.88
−22.9%
3.16
+22.9%
1440p7.48
−137%
3.16
+137%
4K18.69
−137%
7.90
+137%
  • GT 1030 has 23% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GT 1030 has 137% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GT 1030 has 137% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+46.7%
15
−46.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+51.6%
31
−51.6%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+100%
11
−100%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+89.5%
19
−89.5%
Fortnite 60−65
+36.2%
47
−36.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+70.4%
27
−70.4%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+64.7%
17
−64.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+35.7%
28
−35.7%
Valorant 95−100
−53.5%
152
+53.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+80.8%
26
−80.8%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 192
+93.9%
95−100
−93.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+214%
7
−214%
Dota 2 75−80
+53.1%
45−50
−53.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+112%
17
−112%
Fortnite 60−65
+77.8%
36
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+91.7%
24
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+100%
14
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+41.4%
29
−41.4%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+214%
7
−214%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+58.3%
24
−58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+33.3%
21
−33.3%
Valorant 95−100
−24.2%
123
+24.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+135%
20
−135%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Dota 2 75−80
+53.1%
45−50
−53.1%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+140%
15
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+188%
16
−188%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+155%
11
−155%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+138%
16
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+133%
12
−133%
Valorant 95−100
+607%
14
−607%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+156%
25
−156%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+78.3%
45−50
−78.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+59.5%
35−40
−59.5%
Valorant 110−120
+73.5%
65−70
−73.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+83.3%
12
−83.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1300%
1
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 35−40
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+157%
7
−157%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

This is how GTX 660 Ti and GT 1030 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is 208% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 660 Ti is 60% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 660 Ti is 60% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 660 Ti is 1300% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 1030 is 54% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is ahead in 65 tests (97%)
  • GT 1030 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.21 6.23
Recency 16 August 2012 17 May 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 660 Ti has a 79.9% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 1030, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1030 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 839 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8110 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 Ti or GeForce GT 1030, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.