Radeon 760M vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM and Radeon 760M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
760M outperforms GTX 660 OEM by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 779 | 401 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 1.81 | 66.99 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) |
GPU code name | GK104 | Phoenix |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 August 2012 (12 years ago) | 31 January 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1152 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 888 MHz | 2599 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 25,390 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 | 83.17 |
Floating-point processing power | 2.046 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 32 | 16 |
TMUs | 96 | 32 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 241 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Motherboard Dependent |
HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.3 |
CUDA | 3.0 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 7−8
−329%
| 30
+329%
|
1440p | 4−5
−350%
| 18
+350%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 105
+0%
|
105
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
God of War | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 77
+0%
|
77
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 38
+0%
|
38
+0%
|
Fortnite | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
God of War | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Valorant | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35
+0%
|
35
+0%
|
Fortnite | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
God of War | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 35
+0%
|
35
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
Valorant | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
God of War | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
Valorant | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Valorant | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
God of War | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Valorant | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
God of War | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
This is how GTX 660 OEM and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:
- Radeon 760M is 329% faster in 1080p
- Radeon 760M is 350% faster in 1440p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.09 | 13.19 |
Recency | 22 August 2012 | 31 January 2024 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Radeon 760M has a 326.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.
The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.