Radeon 760M vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
520 OEM 530X 540 550 550X 550X 640SP 625 OEM 740M 760M 780M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM and Radeon 760M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 660 OEM
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
3.09

760M outperforms GTX 660 OEM by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking783405
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8167.01
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGK104Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 August 2012 (13 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152512
Core clock speed823 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate85.2583.17
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs9632
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−329%
30
+329%
1440p4−5
−350%
18
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
God of War 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
God of War 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
God of War 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+0%
35
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
God of War 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+0%
23
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
God of War 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
God of War 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX 660 OEM and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is 329% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 760M is 350% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.09 13.18
Recency 22 August 2012 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 326.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 Radeon HD 4870 X2
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
vs
R9 280 Radeon R9 280
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
vs
GTX 660 GTX 660
PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 3100
vs
GTX 660 GTX 660
R4 Mobile Graphics Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics
vs
GTX 660 GTX 660
GTX 660 GTX 660
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 5060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
vs
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
G210 OEM GeForce G210 OEM
vs
GT 620 GT 620
HD 7350 OEM Radeon HD 7350 OEM
vs
GT 630 GT 630
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
GTX 670 GTX 670
Quadro2 Go Quadro2 Go
vs
GT 645 OEM GT 645 OEM
GT 120M GeForce GT 120M
vs
GT 610 GT 610

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 35 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 373 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 OEM or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.