Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs GeForce GT 645 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated916
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.34
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF114no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)6 December 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288no data
Core clock speed776 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)102 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate37.25no data
Floating-point processing power0.894 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs48no data
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed957 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth91.87 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 102 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1357.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 645 OEM and Qualcomm Adreno 685. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 645 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
GeForce GT 645 OEM
Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 645 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 17 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 645 OEM or Qualcomm Adreno 685, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.