Radeon HD 6970M vs GeForce GTX 650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 650
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 64 Watt
4.53

Radeon HD 6970M outperforms GeForce GTX 650 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking620558
Place by popularity55not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.362.01
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK107Blackcomb XT
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 September 2012 (11 years ago)6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data
Current price$207 (1.9x MSRP)$257

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6970M has 458% better value for money than GTX 650.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384960
CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1058 MHz680 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt75-100 Watt
Texture fill rate33.9 billion/sec32.64
Floating-point performance812.5 gflops1,305.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 650 and Radeon HD 6970M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length5.70" (14.5 cm)no data
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128-bit GDDR5256 Bit
Memory clock speed5.0 GB/s900 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 4.53
HD 6970M 5.88
+29.8%

Radeon HD 6970M outperforms GeForce GTX 650 by 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 650 1749
HD 6970M 2270
+29.8%

Radeon HD 6970M outperforms GeForce GTX 650 by 30% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
−30%
52
+30%
Full HD40−45
−30%
52
+30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Hitman 3 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−38.9%
24−27
+38.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Hitman 3 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−38.9%
24−27
+38.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−33.3%
27−30
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−38.9%
24−27
+38.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how GTX 650 and HD 6970M compete in popular games:

  • HD 6970M is 30% faster in 900p
  • HD 6970M is 30% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.53 5.88
Recency 6 September 2012 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon HD 6970M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6970M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GeForce GTX 650
AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Radeon HD 6970M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 3580 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 92 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.