GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GTX 590

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 590 with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 590
2011
3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) GDDR5, 365 Watt
8.65

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 590 by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking463279
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.48no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGF110GN20-S7
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 March 2011 (13 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data
Current price$600 (0.9x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed607 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)365 Watt30-45 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.7 billion/sec189.1
Floating-point performance2x 1,244.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 590 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)4 GB
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU)64 Bit
Memory clock speed1707 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth327.7 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC supportno data+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 590 8.65
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.66
+116%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 590 by 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 590 9167
RTX 2050 Mobile 12268
+33.8%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 590 by 34% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 590 25720
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+82%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 590 by 82% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 590 6680
RTX 2050 Mobile 8881
+32.9%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 590 by 33% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47
−113%
100−110
+113%
Full HD106
+152%
42
−152%
1200p112
−114%
240−250
+114%
1440p12−14
−142%
29
+142%
4K12−14
−150%
30
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 no data

This is how GTX 590 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 113% faster in 900p
  • GTX 590 is 152% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 114% faster in 1200p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 142% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.65 18.66
Recency 24 March 2011 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 365 Watt 30 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 590 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 47 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1601 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.