Radeon R4 (Kaveri) vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580M SLI and Radeon R4 (Kaveri), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 580M SLI
2011
100 Watt
10.17
+1083%

GTX 580M SLI outperforms R4 (Kaveri) by a whopping 1083% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4461138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.00no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2Kaveri
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speed620 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (FL 12_0)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580M SLI 10.17
+1083%
R4 (Kaveri) 0.86

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 580M SLI 6106
+899%
R4 (Kaveri) 611

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 580M SLI 25022
+1178%
R4 (Kaveri) 1958

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p76
+1167%
6−7
−1167%
Full HD91
+1038%
8
−1038%
1200p81
+1250%
6−7
−1250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Valorant 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Dota 2 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Fortnite 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+609%
10−12
−609%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Valorant 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
World of Tanks 140−150
+1023%
13
−1023%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Dota 2 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+486%
7−8
−486%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+609%
10−12
−609%
Valorant 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
World of Tanks 70−75
+1725%
4−5
−1725%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Valorant 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Dota 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Fortnite 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Valorant 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

This is how GTX 580M SLI and R4 (Kaveri) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 580M SLI is 1167% faster in 900p
  • GTX 580M SLI is 1038% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 580M SLI is 1250% faster in 1200p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 580M SLI is 2850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 580M SLI surpassed R4 (Kaveri) in all 37 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.17 0.86
Recency 6 January 2011 4 June 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

GTX 580M SLI has a 1082.6% higher aggregate performance score.

R4 (Kaveri), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 580M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R4 (Kaveri) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M SLI
GeForce GTX 580M SLI
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
Radeon R4 (Kaveri)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 11 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Kaveri) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.