Quadro Plex 2100 D4 vs GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking547not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.04no data
Power efficiency2.25no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF110G92
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2010 (13 years ago)25 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480128
Core clock speed732 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt640 Watt
Texture fill rate43.9232.00
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs6064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm522 mm
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB1 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.01.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2010 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 640 Watt

GTX 570 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 192.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and Quadro Plex 2100 D4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Quadro Plex 2100 D4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
Quadro Plex 2100 D4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 D4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.