Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	487	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.79	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	GF114	RS200
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 January 2011 (13 years ago)	5 October 2002 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data
Current price	$130 (0.5x MSRP)	$184

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2
Core clock speed	822 MHz	2 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	180 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	52.67	0.37
Floating-point performance	1,263.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Radeon IGP 340M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	128.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	7.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	25 January 2011	5 October 2002
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	40 nm	180 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---