NVS 5400M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 570 GTX 570 Rev. 2 GTX 580 GTX 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
NVS 2100M NVS 3100M NVS 4200M NVS 5100M NVS 5200M NVS 5400M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 with NVS 5400M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560 Ti 448
2011
1280 MB GDDR5, 210 Watt
8.23
+408%

GTX 560 Ti 448 outperforms NVS 5400M by a whopping 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
NVS 5400M NVS 5400M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking510958
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.70no data
Power efficiency2.693.17
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF110GF108
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date29 November 2011 (13 years ago)1 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44896
Core clock speed732 MHz660 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate40.9910.56
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS0.2534 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs5616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB2 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+400%
15
−400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.85no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVS 5400M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 Ti 448 is 400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 51 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.23 1.62
Recency 29 November 2011 1 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 560 Ti 448 has a 408% higher aggregate performance score.

NVS 5400M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 500% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 5400M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop card while NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 260X Radeon R7 260X
NVS 5400M NVS 5400M
vs
Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
GTX 470 GeForce GTX 470
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
vs
R7 350 640SP Radeon R7 350 640SP
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
ATI 9500 Radeon 9500
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 580 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
GT 625 OEM GeForce GT 625 OEM
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
GTX 650 Ti GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
NVS 4200M NVS 4200M
510 OEM GeForce 510 OEM
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
GT 545 GeForce GT 545
vs
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU
GT 440 GeForce GT 440
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5670 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
R7 M350 Radeon R7 M350
vs
GT 635M GeForce GT 635M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 47 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.