Radeon RX 560X vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Aggregated performance score
Radeon RX 560X outperforms GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 475 | 469 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 0.40 | 0.76 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Polaris 21 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 November 2011 (12 years ago) | 11 April 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | no data |
| Current price | $624 (2.2x MSRP) | $999 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RX 560X has 90% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti 448.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1275 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 40.99 | 81.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM Capacity and Type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | + | + |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 8.16 | 8.25 |
| Recency | 29 November 2011 | 11 April 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 75 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon RX 560X.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
