NVS 4200M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 560 OEM GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 570 GTX 570 Rev. 2 GTX 580 GTX 580 Rev. 2 GTX 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
NVS 2100M NVS 3100M NVS 4200M NVS 5100M NVS 5200M NVS 5400M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 with NVS 4200M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560 Ti 448
2011
1280 MB GDDR5, 210 Watt
7.89
+996%

GTX 560 Ti 448 outperforms NVS 4200M by a whopping 996% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
NVS 4200M NVS 4200M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5131163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
Power efficiency2.712.08
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF110GF119
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date29 November 2011 (13 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44848
Core clock speed732 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate40.996.480
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB1 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.02.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+977%
13
−977%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.06no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
World of Tanks 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
World of Tanks 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVS 4200M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 Ti 448 is 977% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 36 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.89 0.72
Recency 29 November 2011 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 560 Ti 448 has a 995.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

NVS 4200M, on the other hand, has 740% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 4200M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop card while NVS 4200M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
NVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS 4200M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
RX 560X Radeon RX 560X
NVS 4200M NVS 4200M
vs
FX 3500M Quadro FX 3500M
GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 260X Radeon R7 260X
GTX 750 GTX 750
vs
ATI 9500 9500
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 580 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
GT 625 OEM GT 625 OEM
vs
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT
GTX 650 Ti GTX 650 Ti
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
NVS 5400M NVS 5400M
510 OEM 510 OEM
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7
GT 545 GT 545
vs
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU
GT 440 GT 440
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5670 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition
R7 M350 R7 M350
vs
GT 635M GT 635M
R9 M375X R9 M375X
vs
Quadro 4000M 4000M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 146 votes

Rate NVS 4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.