Radeon Sky 900 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking631not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGF114Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 February 2012 (12 years ago)27 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2883584
Core clock speed736 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate35.33106.4
Floating-point processing power0.8479 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs48112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed957 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth91.87 GB/s480 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-
Dual-link DVI support-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 February 2012 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 560 SE has 100% lower power consumption.

Sky 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 SE and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
GeForce GTX 560 SE
AMD Radeon Sky 900
Radeon Sky 900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 85 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.