ATI Radeon X800 XT AGP vs HD Graphics 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking820not rated
Place by popularity88not in top-100
Power efficiency11.89no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2R420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 March 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed350 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt54 Watt
Texture fill rate22.808.000
Floating-point processing power0.3648 TFLOPSno data
ROPs316
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 54 Watt

HD Graphics 530 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 260% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 530 and Radeon X800 XT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 530 is a notebook card while Radeon X800 XT AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
ATI Radeon X800 XT AGP
Radeon X800 XT AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1540 votes

Rate HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.