Quadro GV100 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 550 Ti with Quadro GV100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 550 Ti
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 116 Watt
4.02

Quadro GV100 outperforms GTX 550 Ti by a whopping 1177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking65548
Place by popularity72not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.294.74
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF116GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 March 2011 (13 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $8,999
Current price$197 (1.3x MSRP)$5183 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro GV100 has 1534% better value for money than GTX 550 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed900 MHz1132 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1627 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)116 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature100 °Cno data
Texture fill rate28.8 billion/sec520.6
Floating-point performance691.2 gflops14,817 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length8.25" (21 cm)267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed4.1 GB/s1696 MHz
Memory bandwidth98.4 GB/s868.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 550 Ti 4.02
Quadro GV100 51.34
+1177%

Quadro GV100 outperforms GeForce GTX 550 Ti by 1177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 550 Ti 1551
Quadro GV100 19824
+1178%

Quadro GV100 outperforms GeForce GTX 550 Ti by 1178% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 550 Ti 5834
Quadro GV100 158931
+2624%

Quadro GV100 outperforms GeForce GTX 550 Ti by 2624% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p38
−1084%
450−500
+1084%
Full HD32
−1150%
400−450
+1150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1122%
220−230
+1122%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−1150%
250−260
+1150%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−1150%
250−260
+1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1122%
220−230
+1122%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−1150%
250−260
+1150%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−1150%
250−260
+1150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1122%
220−230
+1122%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−1150%
250−260
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−1150%
250−260
+1150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1114%
85−90
+1114%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

This is how GTX 550 Ti and Quadro GV100 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 1084% faster in 900p
  • Quadro GV100 is 1150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.02 51.34
Recency 15 March 2011 27 March 2018
Cost $149 $8999
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 116 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 550 Ti has its recommended price lower by $8850, and 115.5% lower power consumption.

Quadro GV100, on the other hand, has a 1177.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 550 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro GV100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 59222 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 52 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.