Mobility Radeon X1350 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 657 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 71 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.30 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | no data |
| GPU code name | GF116 | M52 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 March 2011 (13 years ago) | 18 September 2006 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 6 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 2 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 470 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 107 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 116 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 1.484 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 550 Ti and Mobility Radeon X1350 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 210 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2050 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 98.5 GB/s | 5.184 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 15 March 2011 | 18 September 2006 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 90 nm |
GTX 550 Ti has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 550 Ti and Mobility Radeon X1350. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon X1350 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
