GeForce 9200M GS vs GTX 550 Ti

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	650	not rated
Place by popularity	66	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.28	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GF116	NB9M-GE
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	15 March 2011 (13 years ago)	3 June 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$197 (1.3x MSRP)	$180

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	8
CUDA cores	192	8
Core clock speed	900 MHz	550 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	116 Watt	13 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	100 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	28.8 billion/sec	4.400
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	22.4 gflops
Gigaflops	no data	31

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 550 Ti and GeForce 9200M GS compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	8.25" (21 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	One 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4.1 GB/s	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	98.4 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.2	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	15 March 2011	3 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	116 Watt	13 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---