UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Place in the ranking	681	667
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	20.67
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	no data	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	no data	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	336	256
Core clock speed	675 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	no data	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	20.80
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	System Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−2.3%

45−50
+2.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	10 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Fortnite	24−27 −4%	24−27 +4%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	15 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
World of Tanks	70−75 −2.7%	75−80 +2.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −2.6%	35−40 +2.6%
Valorant	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −3.6%	27−30 +3.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
World of Tanks	30−35 −3.2%	30−35 +3.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Fortnite	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Valorant	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

This is how GTX 460 768MB and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is 2% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 460 768MB is 7% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 40% faster.

All in all, in popular games: