Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 460 768MB with Quadro P3200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.
P3200 Max-Q outperforms GTX 460 768MB by a whopping 445% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 723 | 281 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 22.02 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | no data | GP104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | no data | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 336 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1139 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1404 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 157.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 5.032 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 112 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1753 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 168.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 47
−432%
| 250−260
+432%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| God of War | 10−11
−400%
|
50−55
+400%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−431%
|
85−90
+431%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−442%
|
65−70
+442%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
−422%
|
120−130
+422%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−426%
|
100−105
+426%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
−400%
|
50−55
+400%
|
| God of War | 10−11
−400%
|
50−55
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
−437%
|
290−300
+437%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−431%
|
85−90
+431%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−386%
|
350−400
+386%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
−428%
|
190−200
+428%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−442%
|
65−70
+442%
|
| Fortnite | 21−24
−422%
|
120−130
+422%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−426%
|
100−105
+426%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
−400%
|
50−55
+400%
|
| God of War | 10−11
−400%
|
50−55
+400%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−442%
|
65−70
+442%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
−437%
|
290−300
+437%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−431%
|
85−90
+431%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
−428%
|
190−200
+428%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−442%
|
65−70
+442%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−426%
|
100−105
+426%
|
| God of War | 10−11
−400%
|
50−55
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−442%
|
65−70
+442%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
−437%
|
290−300
+437%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 21−24
−422%
|
120−130
+422%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
−416%
|
160−170
+416%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−431%
|
170−180
+431%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−435%
|
230−240
+435%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−400%
|
50−55
+400%
|
| God of War | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−431%
|
85−90
+431%
|
| Valorant | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−438%
|
70−75
+438%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
| God of War | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
This is how GTX 460 768MB and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:
- P3200 Max-Q is 432% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.98 | 21.68 |
P3200 Max-Q has a 444.7% higher aggregate performance score.
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 768MB in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
