Matrox Parhelia DL256 vs Radeon HD 6950M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking769not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.01no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameBlackcombParhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed580 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate27.843.200
Floating-point processing power1.114 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI-X
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz500 MBps
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x LFH60

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 6950M has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6950M and Matrox Parhelia DL256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6950M is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Parhelia DL256 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6950M
Radeon HD 6950M
Matrox Parhelia DL256
Parhelia DL256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Parhelia DL256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6950M or Matrox Parhelia DL256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.