Radeon RX 640 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

Place in the ranking	689	616
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.91	7.41
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	N10E-GTX	Polaris 23
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	640
Core clock speed	576 MHz	1082 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1218 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	48.72
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.559 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1020 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	48 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 285M SLI 4.15

RX 640 5.37
+29.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 285M SLI 11233

RX 640 14141
+25.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

57
+119%

−119%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Elden Ring	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −100%	26 +100%
Valorant	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Dota 2	12−14 −38.5%	18 +38.5%
Elden Ring	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −42.9%	30 +42.9%
Fortnite	24−27 −33.3%	30−35 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Valorant	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
World of Tanks	70−75 −24.3%	85−90 +24.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Dota 2	12−14 −277%	49 +277%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −23.8%	24−27 +23.8%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Valorant	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Elden Ring	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −17.2%	30−35 +17.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
World of Tanks	27−30 −34.5%	35−40 +34.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Valorant	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Elden Ring	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −6.3%	16−18 +6.3%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Fortnite	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Valorant	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and RX 640 compete in popular games:

GTX 285M SLI is 119% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 640 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 640 is ahead in 57 tests (93%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.15	5.37
Recency	2 March 2009	13 May 2019
Chip lithography	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt

RX 640 has a 29.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 640 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.