Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce GTX 280M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 280M and Radeon RX 7600M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 7600M XT outperforms GTX 280M by a whopping 1904% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 937 | 173 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.17 | no data |
| Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | RDNA 3 |
| GPU code name | N10E-GTX | Navi 33 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 585 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 13,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt (75 - 120 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 320.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 280M and Radeon RX 7600M XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | MXM-IV | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 18000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.8 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms GeForce GTX 280M by 1904% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms GeForce GTX 280M by 1905% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon RX 7600M XT outperforms GeForce GTX 280M by 1301% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 5−6
−2240%
| 117
+2240%
|
| 1440p | 2−3
−2900%
| 60
+2900%
|
| 4K | 1−2
−3200%
| 33
+3200%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1150%
|
50−55
+1150%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−2520%
|
131
+2520%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−1425%
|
60−65
+1425%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1150%
|
50−55
+1150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−3300%
|
65−70
+3300%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−1800%
|
75−80
+1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−4067%
|
120−130
+4067%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−1425%
|
60−65
+1425%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−1000%
|
120−130
+1000%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−1414%
|
100−110
+1414%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14
−567%
|
80−85
+567%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−4640%
|
237
+4640%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−1425%
|
60−65
+1425%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1150%
|
50−55
+1150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−3300%
|
65−70
+3300%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−1800%
|
75−80
+1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−4067%
|
120−130
+4067%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−1425%
|
60−65
+1425%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−1000%
|
120−130
+1000%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−2871%
|
208
+2871%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1280%
|
65−70
+1280%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14
−567%
|
80−85
+567%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−1600%
|
85
+1600%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−1425%
|
60−65
+1425%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1150%
|
50−55
+1150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−3300%
|
65−70
+3300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−5900%
|
180
+5900%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−1173%
|
140
+1173%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−2471%
|
180
+2471%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1900%
|
100
+1900%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 12−14
−400%
|
60
+400%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−2750%
|
55−60
+2750%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−1160%
|
60−65
+1160%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−6100%
|
62
+6100%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−975%
|
40−45
+975%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2000%
|
21−24
+2000%
|
| Hitman 3 | 7−8
−429%
|
35−40
+429%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
−2020%
|
106
+2020%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−7300%
|
74
+7300%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−1175%
|
50−55
+1175%
|
4K
High Preset
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−750%
|
30−35
+750%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−3100%
|
32
+3100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−2900%
|
30
+2900%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−1900%
|
80−85
+1900%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−767%
|
24−27
+767%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 139
+0%
|
139
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 144
+0%
|
144
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 114
+0%
|
114
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 142
+0%
|
142
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 92
+0%
|
92
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 67
+0%
|
67
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 92
+0%
|
92
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 120
+0%
|
120
+0%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 99
+0%
|
99
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 52
+0%
|
52
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90
+0%
|
90
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 64
+0%
|
64
+0%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
This is how GTX 280M and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:
- RX 7600M XT is 2240% faster in 1080p
- RX 7600M XT is 2900% faster in 1440p
- RX 7600M XT is 3200% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 7300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 7600M XT is ahead in 48 tests (69%)
- there's a draw in 22 tests (31%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.49 | 29.86 |
| Recency | 2 March 2009 | 5 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
GTX 280M has 60% lower power consumption.
RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 1904% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
