UHD Graphics vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260M 260M SLI 280M 280M SLI 285M 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
(Jasper Lake 24 EU) 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 64EU 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 600 605 610 620 730 (Rocket Lake) Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 280M SLI and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 280M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.17

Graphics outperforms 280M SLI by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 280M SLI GTX 280M SLI
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking792666
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Power efficiency1.6339.49
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256256
Core clock speed585 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed950 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Fortnite 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Dota 2 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Fortnite 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Valorant 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Dota 2 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Valorant 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Valorant 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Valorant 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.17 5.12
Recency 2 March 2009 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 61.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280M SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 280M SLI GeForce GTX 280M SLI
vs
HD 8790M Radeon HD 8790M
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
Radeon 820M Radeon 820M
GTX 280M SLI GeForce GTX 280M SLI
vs
HD 7850M Radeon HD 7850M
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
vs
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
vs
Millennium G450
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
vs
Millennium G200 SD
GTX 280M SLI GeForce GTX 280M SLI
vs
9800M GTX GeForce 9800M GTX
GTX 280M SLI GeForce GTX 280M SLI
vs
9300M GS GeForce 9300M GS
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
vs
GTX 280M SLI 280M SLI
HD 6950M Radeon HD 6950M
vs
GeForce 920M GeForce 920M
HD 6950M Radeon HD 6950M
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
HD 6950M Radeon HD 6950M
vs
RX 6500 XT RX 6500 XT
HD 6950M Radeon HD 6950M
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 9532 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M SLI or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.