RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI

Place in the ranking	724	17
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	6.82
Power efficiency	1.58	16.72
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	N10E-GTX	AD102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)	3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	18176
Core clock speed	585 MHz	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2505 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	1,423
Floating-point processing power	no data	91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	192
TMUs	no data	568
Tensor Cores	no data	568
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	950 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 280M SLI 3.43

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 72.57
+2016%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 280M SLI 9435

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+1240%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −2225%	186 +2225%
1440p	7−8 −2200%	161 +2200%
4K	5−6 −2240%	117 +2240%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	36.55
1440p	no data	42.23
4K	no data	58.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
−1900%

120−130

+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −1400%	150−160 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −6500%	130−140 +6500%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −3817%	230−240 +3817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1571%	110−120 +1571%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −1900%	180−190 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1174%	240−250 +1174%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1513%	120−130 +1513%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −1000%	260−270 +1000%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −3000%	150−160 +3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −1438%	120−130 +1438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −2300%	300−350 +2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −283%	150−160 +283%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −1400%	150−160 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −6500%	130−140 +6500%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −3817%	230−240 +3817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1571%	110−120 +1571%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −1900%	180−190 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1174%	240−250 +1174%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1513%	120−130 +1513%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −1000%	260−270 +1000%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −3000%	150−160 +3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −1438%	120−130 +1438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −2300%	300−350 +2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −960%	150−160 +960%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −283%	150−160 +283%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −1400%	150−160 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −6500%	130−140 +6500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1571%	110−120 +1571%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1174%	240−250 +1174%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1513%	120−130 +1513%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −1000%	260−270 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −2300%	300−350 +2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1633%	260 +1633%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −283%	150−160 +283%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−1438%

120−130
+1438%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −2667%	160−170 +2667%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −2140%	110−120 +2140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2800%	85−90 +2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4000%	80−85 +4000%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −2000%	80−85 +2000%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	270−280
Hitman 3	8−9 −1238%	100−110 +1238%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2263%	180−190 +2263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −10850%	219 +10850%
Watch Dogs: Legion	20−22 −1100%	240−250 +1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−1586%

110−120
+1586%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −4300%	85−90 +4300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −3350%	65−70 +3350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −2950%	60−65 +2950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −5800%	55−60 +5800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −5100%	50−55 +5100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −13100%	130−140 +13100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −4700%	45−50 +4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1950%

80−85
+1950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	99 +0%	99 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	87 +0%	87 +0%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	184 +0%	184 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

110−120

+0%

110−120

+0%

This is how GTX 280M SLI and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 2225% faster in 1080p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 2200% faster in 1440p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 2240% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 13100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 57 tests (88%)
there's a draw in 8 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.43	72.57
Recency	2 March 2009	3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	300 Watt

GTX 280M SLI has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 2015.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a notebook card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.