GeForce GTX 280M vs 9800M GTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX and GeForce GTX 280M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9800M GTX
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 75 Watt
1.17

GTX 280M outperforms 9800M GTX by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1074984
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency1.091.38
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG92G92
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)3 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$328.50 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112128
CUDA cores per GPU112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz585 MHz
Number of transistors754 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate28.0037.44
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPS0.3745 TFLOPS
Gigaflops420562
ROPs1616
TMUs5664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-IV
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options++
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHzUp to 950 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s61 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GTX 1.17
GTX 280M 1.48
+26.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800M GTX 454
GTX 280M 575
+26.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9800M GTX 4825
GTX 280M 6672
+38.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Fortnite 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
World of Tanks 24−27
−19.2%
30−35
+19.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Valorant 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 280M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 280M is ahead in 28 tests (67%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (33%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 1.48
Recency 15 July 2008 3 March 2009

GTX 280M has a 26.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

The GeForce GTX 280M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
GeForce 9800M GTX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GeForce GTX 280M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.