Radeon Instinct MI300X vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameGT200BAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 February 2010 (14 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24019456
Core clock speed633 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2100 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate50.642,554
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs28no data
TMUs801216
Tensor Coresno data1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB192 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 February 2010 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 192 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 750 Watt

GTX 275 PhysX Edition has 242.5% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 21842.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI300X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.