Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs GeForce GTX 1660

Place in the ranking	186	417
Place by popularity	38	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	48.18	no data
Power efficiency	17.30	19.72
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	no data
GPU code name	TU116	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	14 March 2019 (5 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$219	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	1536
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	157.1	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.027 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	88	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	no data
Memory bus width	192 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2001 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.1 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 30.29
+163%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.51

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 21064
+198%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 71229
+196%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 14164
+103%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	83 +124%	37 −124%
1440p	49 +172%	18−20 −172%
4K	26 +189%	9−10 −189%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.64	no data
1440p	4.47	no data
4K	8.42	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

71
+196%

24−27

−196%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +171%	24−27 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 +181%	21−24 −181%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +183%	35−40 −183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	73 +170%	27−30 −170%
Cyberpunk 2077	58 +176%	21−24 −176%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +183%	24−27 −183%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +185%	27−30 −185%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +175%	60−65 −175%
Hitman 3	69 +188%	24−27 −188%
Horizon Zero Dawn	306 +178%	110−120 −178%
Metro Exodus	144 +188%	50−55 −188%
Red Dead Redemption 2	112 +180%	40−45 −180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +200%	35−40 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	227 +167%	85−90 −167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	123 +173%	45−50 −173%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	42 +200%	14−16 −200%
Battlefield 5	95−100 +183%	35−40 −183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	67 +179%	24−27 −179%
Cyberpunk 2077	47 +194%	16−18 −194%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +183%	24−27 −183%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +185%	27−30 −185%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +175%	60−65 −175%
Hitman 3	67 +179%	24−27 −179%
Horizon Zero Dawn	287 +187%	100−105 −187%
Metro Exodus	113 +183%	40−45 −183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	79 +163%	30−33 −163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110 +175%	40−45 −175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +167%	24−27 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	214 +168%	80−85 −168%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +171%	24−27 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	37 +164%	14−16 −164%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	49 +172%	18−20 −172%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +186%	14−16 −186%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +183%	24−27 −183%
Forza Horizon 4	98 +180%	35−40 −180%
Hitman 3	59 +181%	21−24 −181%
Horizon Zero Dawn	93 +166%	35−40 −166%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95 +171%	35−40 −171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 +171%	21−24 −171%
Watch Dogs: Legion	29 +190%	10−11 −190%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

81
+170%

30−33

−170%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +171%	21−24 −171%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +188%	16−18 −188%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +167%	12−14 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27 +170%	10−11 −170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	34 +183%	12−14 −183%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +167%	9−10 −167%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +168%	65−70 −168%
Hitman 3	39 +179%	14−16 −179%
Horizon Zero Dawn	67 +179%	24−27 −179%
Metro Exodus	59 +181%	21−24 −181%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	67 +179%	24−27 −179%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +186%	14−16 −186%
Watch Dogs: Legion	187 +167%	70−75 −167%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

53
+194%

18−20

−194%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
Hitman 3	21 +200%	7−8 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	63 +200%	21−24 −200%
Metro Exodus	44 +175%	16−18 −175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +192%	12−14 −192%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 +200%	5−6 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	17 +183%	6−7 −183%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +233%	3−4 −233%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Forza Horizon 4	50 +178%	18−20 −178%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	36 +200%	12−14 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12 +200%	4−5 −200%