Arc Pro B60 vs GeForce GTX 1660

Place in the ranking	232	197
Place by popularity	51	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	36.20	32.79
Power efficiency	17.69	11.92
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Xe2 (2024)
GPU code name	TU116	BMG-G21
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	14 March 2019 (6 years ago)	5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$219	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 1660 has 10% better value for money than Arc Pro B60.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	2560
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	157.1	384.0
Floating-point processing power	5.027 TFLOPS	12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	88	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20
L1 Cache	1.4 MB	no data
L2 Cache	1536 KB	4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x8
Length	229 mm	167 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2001 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.1 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.4
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 26.33

Arc Pro B60 29.58
+12.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 11642
Samples: 7856

Arc Pro B60 13079
+12.3%

Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	83 −8.4%	90−95 +8.4%
1440p	50 −10%	55−60 +10%
4K	27 −11.1%	30−35 +11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.64 +110%	5.54 −110%
1440p	4.38 +107%	9.07 −107%
4K	8.11 +105%	16.63 −105%

GTX 1660 has 110% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1660 has 107% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1660 has 105% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	271 −10.7%	300−310 +10.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	71 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Hogwarts Legacy	79 −7.6%	85−90 +7.6%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	100−110 −12.1%	120−130 +12.1%
Counter-Strike 2	223 −12.1%	250−260 +12.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	58 −12.1%	65−70 +12.1%
Far Cry 5	100 −10%	110−120 +10%
Fortnite	130−140 −5.3%	140−150 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	132 −6.1%	140−150 +6.1%
Forza Horizon 5	100 −10%	110−120 +10%
Hogwarts Legacy	59 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −6.2%	120−130 +6.2%
Valorant	306 +2%	300−310 −2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	100−110 −12.1%	120−130 +12.1%
Counter-Strike 2	107 −12.1%	120−130 +12.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280 −10.7%	300−310 +10.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	47 −6.4%	50−55 +6.4%
Dota 2	219 −9.6%	240−250 +9.6%
Far Cry 5	92 −8.7%	100−105 +8.7%
Fortnite	130−140 −5.3%	140−150 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	123 −5.7%	130−140 +5.7%
Forza Horizon 5	88 −8%	95−100 +8%
Grand Theft Auto V	115 −4.3%	120−130 +4.3%
Hogwarts Legacy	46 −8.7%	50−55 +8.7%
Metro Exodus	57 −5.3%	60−65 +5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −6.2%	120−130 +6.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	102 −7.8%	110−120 +7.8%
Valorant	287 −4.5%	300−310 +4.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	100−110 −12.1%	120−130 +12.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	197 −11.7%	220−230 +11.7%
Far Cry 5	86 −10.5%	95−100 +10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	98 −12.2%	110−120 +12.2%
Hogwarts Legacy	36 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −6.2%	120−130 +6.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	57 −5.3%	60−65 +5.3%
Valorant	115 −4.3%	120−130 +4.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

130−140

−5.3%

140−150
+5.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	62 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	190−200 −11.1%	220−230 +11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	52 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
Metro Exodus	33 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	129 −8.5%	140−150 +8.5%
Valorant	226 −10.6%	250−260 +10.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	75−80 −10.4%	85−90 +10.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	59 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%
Forza Horizon 4	76 −11.8%	85−90 +11.8%
Hogwarts Legacy	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −4.2%	50−55 +4.2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

70−75

−7.1%

75−80
+7.1%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	16 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	49 −12.2%	55−60 +12.2%
Hogwarts Legacy	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	20 −5%	21−24 +5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 +0%	35−40 +0%
Valorant	125 −12%	140−150 +12%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	40−45 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	87 −9.2%	95−100 +9.2%
Far Cry 5	30 +0%	30−33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50 −10%	55−60 +10%
Hogwarts Legacy	13 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

30−35

−6.1%

35−40
+6.1%

This is how GTX 1660 and Arc Pro B60 compete in popular games:

Arc Pro B60 is 8% faster in 1080p
Arc Pro B60 is 10% faster in 1440p
Arc Pro B60 is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	26.33	29.58
Recency	14 March 2019	5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	200 Watt

GTX 1660 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B60, on the other hand, has a 12.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B60 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GTX 1660

Arc Pro B60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce GTX 1660

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 6141 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

2.4 13 votes

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 or Arc Pro B60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Arc Pro B60 vs GeForce GTX 1660

Aggregate performance score

Contents

Primary details

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Form factor & compatibility

VRAM capacity and type

Connectivity and outputs

API and SDK support

Synthetic benchmarks

Combined synthetic benchmark score

Passmark

Gaming performance

Average FPS across all PC games

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

Vote for your favorite

Other comparisons

Community ratings

Comments