GeForce GT 330M vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GeForce GT 330M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
28.84
+5050%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 330M by a whopping 5050% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2031224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency24.781.68
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTU116GT216
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153648
Core clock speed1455 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate152.610.00
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS0.06528 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data182
ROPs488
TMUs9616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHzUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s25.28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 28.84
+5050%
GT 330M 0.56

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 49309
+1755%
GT 330M 2658

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p500−550
+4900%
10
−4900%
Full HD90
+400%
18
−400%
1440p60
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
4K380−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.54no data
1440p3.82no data
4K6.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 109
+5350%
2−3
−5350%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+800%
7−8
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+4200%
2−3
−4200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 81
+3950%
2−3
−3950%
Battlefield 5 111
+5450%
2−3
−5450%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+671%
7−8
−671%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
Far Cry 5 93
+9200%
1−2
−9200%
Fortnite 120−130
+6350%
2−3
−6350%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+3250%
4−5
−3250%
Forza Horizon 5 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+1429%
7−8
−1429%
Valorant 209
+646%
27−30
−646%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50
+2400%
2−3
−2400%
Battlefield 5 103
+5050%
2−3
−5050%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+600%
7−8
−600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+1471%
16−18
−1471%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Dota 2 121
+1000%
10−12
−1000%
Far Cry 5 89
+8800%
1−2
−8800%
Fortnite 120−130
+6350%
2−3
−6350%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+3025%
4−5
−3025%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+5150%
2−3
−5150%
Metro Exodus 54 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+1429%
7−8
−1429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+2475%
4−5
−2475%
Valorant 207
+639%
27−30
−639%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+9300%
1−2
−9300%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+686%
7−8
−686%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Dota 2 116
+955%
10−12
−955%
Far Cry 5 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+2375%
4−5
−2375%
Forza Horizon 5 50 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+1457%
7−8
−1457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Valorant 125
+346%
27−30
−346%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+5250%
2−3
−5250%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+18700%
1−2
−18700%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+4300%
3−4
−4300%
Valorant 197
+6467%
3−4
−6467%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 25 0−1
Far Cry 5 60
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Forza Horizon 5 42 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+247%
14−16
−247%
Metro Exodus 19 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35 0−1
Valorant 152
+4967%
3−4
−4967%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10 0−1
Dota 2 85
+8400%
1−2
−8400%
Far Cry 5 31
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GT 330M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 4900% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 400% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 5900% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 18700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 Ti Mobile surpassed GT 330M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.84 0.56
Recency 23 April 2019 10 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 5050% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

GT 330M, on the other hand, has 247.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
GeForce GT 330M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1612 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 126 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or GeForce GT 330M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.