GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GT 330M

Place in performance ranking	1177	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	80
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.34
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N11P-GE1	N18P-G62
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$448	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 330M and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	1024
CUDA cores	48	no data
Core clock speed	575 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	9.200	95.04
Floating-point performance	121.44 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	182	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 330M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 330M 0.55

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.19
+3571%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 330M by 3571% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 330M 214

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+3543%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 330M by 3543% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 330M 2658

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+1538%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 330M by 1538% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	10 −3400%	350−400 +3400%
Full HD	16 −263%	58 +263%
1440p	1−2 −4600%	47 +4600%
4K	0−1	23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1867%

59
+1867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	61
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1667%	53 +1667%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1433%	46 +1433%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −8300%	84 +8300%
Hitman 3	2−3 −2450%	51 +2450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −858%	115 +858%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1257%	95 +1257%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −567%	60 +567%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	46
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1467%	47 +1467%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1100%	36 +1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −5800%	59 +5800%
Hitman 3	2−3 −2150%	45 +2150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1400%	180 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −971%	75 +971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2300%	72 +2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −1933%	183 +1933%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	27
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −933%	31 +933%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1033%	34 +1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −433%	64 +433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −800%	63 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1200%	39 +1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −144%	22 +144%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −550%	24−27 +550%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −3300%	30−35 +3300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −367%	28 +367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1000%

30−35
+1000%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn

1−2

−2100%

21−24
+2100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−800%

18−20
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −4800%	49 +4800%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −6500%	65−70 +6500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −6800%	69 +6800%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −4450%	90−95 +4450%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −4450%	91 +4450%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4300%	44 +4300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	32
Battlefield 5	1−2 −6500%	65−70 +6500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −5700%	58 +5700%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −4450%	90−95 +4450%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −6700%	68 +6700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4100%	42 +4100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	15
Far Cry 5	1−2 −3800%	39 +3800%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −4450%	90−95 +4450%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−4000%

41
+4000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3800%	35−40 +3800%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	21−24
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	18−20
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −3800%	35−40 +3800%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −3700%	35−40 +3700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −4100%	40−45 +4100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	21−24
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	14−16

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	20−22
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	20
Hitman 3	0−1	16
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	25

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	10−11
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	10−12
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	6
Far Cry 5	0−1	12
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	27−30
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	8−9

This is how GT 330M and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 3400% faster in 900p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 263% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 4600% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 8300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 1650 Ti Mobile surpassed GT 330M in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.55	20.19
Recency	10 January 2010	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	50 Watt