UHD Graphics vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
22.92
+310%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 310% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking248607
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.11no data
Power efficiency26.3638.57
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTU116Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536256
Core clock speed1140 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1335 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate128.212.00
Floating-point processing power4.101 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs9616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.92
+310%
UHD Graphics 5.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+310%
UHD Graphics 2151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD78
+333%
18−20
−333%
4K34
+325%
8−9
−325%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.94no data
4K6.74no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Elden Ring 70−75
+311%
18−20
−311%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+344%
16−18
−344%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%
Metro Exodus 81
+350%
18−20
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+338%
21−24
−338%
Valorant 102
+325%
24−27
−325%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+372%
18−20
−372%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Dota 2 89
+324%
21−24
−324%
Elden Ring 70−75
+311%
18−20
−311%
Far Cry 5 62
+343%
14−16
−343%
Fortnite 110−120
+333%
27−30
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+314%
21−24
−314%
Metro Exodus 57
+375%
12−14
−375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 172
+330%
40−45
−330%
Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+322%
9−10
−322%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+356%
16−18
−356%
Valorant 63
+350%
14−16
−350%
World of Tanks 240−250
+313%
60−65
−313%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+344%
16−18
−344%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+320%
10−11
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Dota 2 86
+378%
18−20
−378%
Far Cry 5 117
+333%
27−30
−333%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+323%
35−40
−323%
Valorant 93
+343%
21−24
−343%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
Elden Ring 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+335%
40−45
−335%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
World of Tanks 150−160
+337%
35−40
−337%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Valorant 60−65
+336%
14−16
−336%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Dota 2 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Elden Ring 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+331%
16−18
−331%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 35−40
+333%
9−10
−333%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Fortnite 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Valorant 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 333% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 325% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.92 5.59
Recency 23 April 2019 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 10 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a 310% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 557 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6717 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.