Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	228	249
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	15.90	4.69
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N18E-G0	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data
Current price	$1037 (4.5x MSRP)	$2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has 239% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	1024
Core clock speed	1140 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	128.2	114.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.77
+10.4%

T2000 Mobile 20.63

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
+10.4%

T2000 Mobile 7985

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 10% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 17439
+29%

T2000 Mobile 13524

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 29% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	79 +12.9%	70−75 −12.9%
4K	33 +22.2%	27−30 −22.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40
+12.1%

30−35

−12.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 +33.3%	40−45 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +11.1%	35−40 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	83 +20.3%	65−70 −20.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 +63%	50−55 −63%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
Far Cry 5	69 +27.8%	50−55 −27.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	81 +47.3%	55−60 −47.3%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +8.5%	70−75 −8.5%
Hitman 3	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	78 +77.3%	40−45 −77.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	72 +112%	30−35 −112%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70 +59.1%	40−45 −59.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	51 +21.4%	40−45 −21.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +11.1%	35−40 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	78 +13%	65−70 −13%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68 +25.9%	50−55 −25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
Far Cry 5	66 +22.2%	50−55 −22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	78 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +8.5%	70−75 −8.5%
Hitman 3	65−70 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	58 +31.8%	40−45 −31.8%
Metro Exodus	48 +45.5%	30−35 −45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	38 +11.8%	30−35 −11.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60 +36.4%	40−45 −36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	92 +104%	45−50 −104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	42 +0%	40−45 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +11.1%	35−40 −11.1%
Battlefield 5	73 +5.8%	65−70 −5.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +12.1%	30−35 −12.1%
Far Cry 5	62 +14.8%	50−55 −14.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	71 +29.1%	55−60 −29.1%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +8.5%	70−75 −8.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 +13.3%	45−50 −13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +10%	40−45 −10%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +12.9%	30−35 −12.9%
Hitman 3	35−40 +15.2%	30−35 −15.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +10%	20−22 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +13.6%	21−24 −13.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +15.8%	18−20 −15.8%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +10.9%	45−50 −10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +11.4%	35−40 −11.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +12.8%	35−40 −12.8%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +9.5%	40−45 −9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Hitman 3	21−24 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Battlefield 5	38 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	30 +76.5%	16−18 −76.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +10%	20−22 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +10.3%	27−30 −10.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%