T400 4 GB vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

Place in performance ranking	148	429
Place by popularity	8	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	28.60	8.59
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Turing TU116	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	29 October 2019 (4 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	no data
Current price	$277 (1.2x MSRP)	$216

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Super has 233% better value for money than T400 4 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	384
Core clock speed	1530 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	157.1	34.20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.07
+244%

T400 4 GB 9.62

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms T400 4 GB by 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Super 12771
+244%

T400 4 GB 3715

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms T400 4 GB by 244% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90 +275%	24−27 −275%
1440p	54 +286%	14−16 −286%
4K	30 +275%	8−9 −275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

260−270

+242%

76
−242%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	300−310 +241%	88 −241%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	220−230 +233%	66 −233%
Battlefield 5	350−400 +227%	100−110 −227%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	270−280 +238%	80 −238%
Cyberpunk 2077	210−220 +233%	63 −233%
Far Cry 5	250−260 +238%	70−75 −238%
Far Cry New Dawn	400−450 +231%	121 −231%
Forza Horizon 4	450−500 +213%	144 −213%
Hitman 3	260−270 +238%	77 −238%
Horizon Zero Dawn	600−650 +223%	186 −223%
Metro Exodus	450−500 +213%	144 −213%
Red Dead Redemption 2	270−280 +238%	80 −238%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	550−600 +237%	163 −237%
Watch Dogs: Legion	280−290 +237%	83 −237%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	250−260 +242%	73 −242%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	160−170 +233%	48 −233%
Battlefield 5	350−400 +227%	100−110 −227%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	240−250 +233%	72 −233%
Cyberpunk 2077	170−180 +227%	52 −227%
Far Cry 5	250−260 +238%	70−75 −238%
Far Cry New Dawn	290−300 +237%	86 −237%
Forza Horizon 4	450−500 +238%	130−140 −238%
Hitman 3	210−220 +233%	63 −233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	950−1000 +228%	290 −228%
Metro Exodus	350−400 +215%	111 −215%
Red Dead Redemption 2	220−230 +244%	64 −244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +210%	129 −210%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	350−400 +210%	113 −210%
Watch Dogs: Legion	700−750 +237%	208 −237%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	170−180 +233%	51 −233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +241%	44 −241%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	180−190 +227%	55 −227%
Cyberpunk 2077	160−170 +227%	49 −227%
Far Cry 5	250−260 +238%	70−75 −238%
Forza Horizon 4	350−400 +227%	107 −227%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +203%	99 −203%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 +213%	112 −213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	200−210 +228%	61 −228%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 +223%	31 −223%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

190−200

+233%

57
−233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	210−220 +233%	60−65 −233%
Far Cry New Dawn	280−290 +241%	82 −241%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +225%	40 −225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +224%	34 −224%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	180−190 +240%	53 −240%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +227%	26 −227%
Far Cry 5	220−230 +238%	65 −238%
Forza Horizon 4	280−290 +233%	84 −233%
Hitman 3	140−150 +226%	43 −226%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +238%	71 −238%
Metro Exodus	230−240 +243%	67 −243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 +238%	80 −238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +233%	45−50 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 +233%	24 −233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

190−200

+239%

56
−239%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +233%	30−35 −233%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +223%	31 −223%
Hitman 3	85−90 +240%	25 −240%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +225%	40−45 −225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +233%	27 −233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +225%	40 −225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	80−85 +233%	24 −233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 +233%	18 −233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +242%	19 −242%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +218%	11 −218%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +242%	18−20 −242%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 +233%	54 −233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +225%	40 −225%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +243%	35 −243%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +233%	12 −233%