Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking153not rated
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation28.57no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameTuring TU116RS780
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)4 March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$277 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140840
Core clock speed1530 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.12.000

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5no data

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 29 October 2019 4 March 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Super and Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP
Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17265 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.