Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
32.89
+337%

GTX 1660 Super outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking168537
Place by popularity7not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.20no data
Power efficiency18.1518.56
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTU116Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 October 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140880
Core clock speed1530 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate157.1no data
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs88no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+
NVENC+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Super 32.89
+337%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.53

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Super 21981
+312%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Super 76654
+253%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Super 15995
+299%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Super 95473
+335%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Super 477037
+187%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD92
+360%
20
−360%
1440p57
+470%
10
−470%
4K31
+121%
14
−121%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.49no data
1440p4.02no data
4K7.39no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 124
+439%
23
−439%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+718%
11
−718%
Cyberpunk 2077 76
+443%
14
−443%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 91
+469%
16
−469%
Battlefield 5 97
+273%
26
−273%
Counter-Strike 2 62
+589%
9
−589%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+425%
12
−425%
Far Cry 5 112
+460%
20
−460%
Fortnite 140−150
+228%
40−45
−228%
Forza Horizon 4 144
+350%
30−35
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 96
+586%
14
−586%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+373%
24−27
−373%
Valorant 321
+322%
75−80
−322%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 52
+333%
12
−333%
Battlefield 5 83
+261%
23
−261%
Counter-Strike 2 52
+420%
10
−420%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+141%
110−120
−141%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+420%
10
−420%
Dota 2 231
+492%
39
−492%
Far Cry 5 103
+442%
19
−442%
Fortnite 140−150
+228%
40−45
−228%
Forza Horizon 4 135
+322%
30−35
−322%
Forza Horizon 5 67
+294%
16−18
−294%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+923%
13
−923%
Metro Exodus 56
+367%
12
−367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139
+435%
24−27
−435%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+414%
22
−414%
Valorant 290
+282%
75−80
−282%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 77
+235%
23
−235%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+860%
5
−860%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+444%
9
−444%
Dota 2 211
+486%
36
−486%
Far Cry 5 95
+428%
18
−428%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+234%
30−35
−234%
Forza Horizon 5 67
+644%
9
−644%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 104
+300%
24−27
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+455%
11
−455%
Valorant 122
+60.5%
75−80
−60.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+228%
40−45
−228%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+287%
55−60
−287%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+933%
6
−933%
Metro Exodus 36
+414%
7−8
−414%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 162
+315%
35−40
−315%
Valorant 262
+223%
80−85
−223%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+329%
14−16
−329%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+333%
6
−333%
Far Cry 5 65
+442%
12
−442%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+394%
16−18
−394%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+225%
12−14
−225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+440%
10
−440%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+450%
14−16
−450%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+233%
18−20
−233%
Metro Exodus 22
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+567%
6−7
−567%
Valorant 132
+267%
35−40
−267%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+500%
6−7
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Dota 2 95
+494%
16
−494%
Far Cry 5 33
+371%
7−8
−371%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+391%
10−12
−391%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+414%
7−8
−414%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 360% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 470% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 121% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Super is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.89 7.53
Recency 29 October 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 1660 Super has a 336.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 346.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 21297 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 946 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Super or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.