Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.47
+342%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking158525
Place by popularity3347
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.70no data
Power efficiency19.4418.84
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameTU116Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153680
Core clock speed1500 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate169.9no data
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.47
+342%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.57

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
+329%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5332

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti 61217
+182%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti 16024
+300%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 4010

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 93095
+324%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21931

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 483604
+190%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 166479

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+442%
19
−442%
1440p60
+500%
10
−500%
4K37
+164%
14
−164%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.71no data
1440p4.65no data
4K7.54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
+457%
14
−457%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86
+353%
18−20
−353%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+289%
19
−289%
Battlefield 5 130
+491%
21−24
−491%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
+533%
14−16
−533%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+446%
13
−446%
Far Cry 5 104
+512%
16−18
−512%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+433%
21−24
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 231
+371%
45−50
−371%
Hitman 3 70−75
+338%
16
−338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+237%
40−45
−237%
Metro Exodus 134
+253%
38
−253%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+495%
20−22
−495%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 171
+584%
24−27
−584%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+93.5%
62
−93.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 122
+542%
18−20
−542%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+244%
16
−244%
Battlefield 5 121
+450%
21−24
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85
+467%
14−16
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+470%
10
−470%
Far Cry 5 82
+382%
16−18
−382%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+276%
21−24
−276%
Forza Horizon 4 218
+345%
45−50
−345%
Hitman 3 70−75
+367%
15
−367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+237%
40−45
−237%
Metro Exodus 114
+322%
27
−322%
Red Dead Redemption 2 89
+345%
20−22
−345%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127
+429%
24
−429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+218%
21−24
−218%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+145%
49
−145%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+179%
18−20
−179%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+400%
10−11
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70
+367%
14−16
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+475%
8
−475%
Far Cry 5 61
+259%
16−18
−259%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+98%
45−50
−98%
Hitman 3 70−75
+483%
12
−483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
+538%
16
−538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110
+450%
20
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+464%
11
−464%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+118%
55−60
−118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+385%
20−22
−385%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+436%
14−16
−436%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+391%
10−12
−391%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+486%
7−8
−486%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
+643%
7−8
−643%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+800%
3−4
−800%
Far Cry 5 41
+356%
9−10
−356%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+648%
27−30
−648%
Hitman 3 40−45
+282%
10−12
−282%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75
+369%
16−18
−369%
Metro Exodus 65
+713%
8−9
−713%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+388%
16
−388%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+360%
10
−360%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
+270%
45−50
−270%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65
+400%
12−14
−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 36
+500%
6−7
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+480%
5−6
−480%
Hitman 3 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+552%
24−27
−552%
Metro Exodus 46
+820%
5−6
−820%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+975%
4−5
−975%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+525%
4−5
−525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+733%
3−4
−733%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry 5 20
+400%
4−5
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+538%
8−9
−538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+529%
7−8
−529%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 442% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 500% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 164% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 2050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 Ti surpassed Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.47 7.57
Recency 22 February 2019 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 342.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 7638 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 901 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.