RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Mobile
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
16.09

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms 1650 Mobile by a whopping 322% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34720
Place by popularity60not in top-100
Power efficiency25.9278.13
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU117GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 April 2020 (5 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248960
Core clock speed1380 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate99.84374.4
Floating-point processing power3.195 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cache1 MB8.8 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 Mobile 16.09
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+322%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+322%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
−314%
240−250
+314%
1440p37
−305%
150−160
+305%
4K23
−313%
95−100
+313%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 131
−320%
550−600
+320%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
−304%
210−220
+304%
Hogwarts Legacy 51
−312%
210−220
+312%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60
−317%
250−260
+317%
Counter-Strike 2 113
−298%
450−500
+298%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
−315%
170−180
+315%
Far Cry 5 60
−317%
250−260
+317%
Fortnite 90−95
−272%
350−400
+272%
Forza Horizon 4 82
−266%
300−310
+266%
Forza Horizon 5 68
−312%
280−290
+312%
Hogwarts Legacy 38
−321%
160−170
+321%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−315%
270−280
+315%
Valorant 164
−296%
650−700
+296%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 60
−317%
250−260
+317%
Counter-Strike 2 67
−318%
280−290
+318%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130
−285%
500−550
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
−306%
130−140
+306%
Dota 2 96
−317%
400−450
+317%
Far Cry 5 54
−307%
220−230
+307%
Fortnite 90−95
−272%
350−400
+272%
Forza Horizon 4 80
−275%
300−310
+275%
Forza Horizon 5 60
−317%
250−260
+317%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
−307%
240−250
+307%
Hogwarts Legacy 29
−314%
120−130
+314%
Metro Exodus 33
−294%
130−140
+294%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−315%
270−280
+315%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−319%
260−270
+319%
Valorant 148
−305%
600−650
+305%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 59
−307%
240−250
+307%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−300%
120−130
+300%
Dota 2 89
−293%
350−400
+293%
Far Cry 5 53
−315%
220−230
+315%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−319%
260−270
+319%
Hogwarts Legacy 18
−317%
75−80
+317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
−308%
290−300
+308%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−317%
150−160
+317%
Valorant 130−140
−307%
550−600
+307%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 72
−317%
300−310
+317%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−294%
500−550
+294%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Metro Exodus 20
−300%
80−85
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−294%
650−700
+294%
Valorant 159
−309%
650−700
+309%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 47
−304%
190−200
+304%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−300%
60−65
+300%
Far Cry 5 35
−300%
140−150
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−319%
180−190
+319%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 44
−309%
180−190
+309%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Metro Exodus 12
−317%
50−55
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−305%
85−90
+305%
Valorant 90
−289%
350−400
+289%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 25
−300%
100−105
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−320%
21−24
+320%
Dota 2 45
−300%
180−190
+300%
Far Cry 5 18
−317%
75−80
+317%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 314% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 305% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 313% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.09 67.89
Recency 15 April 2020 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 70 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has 40% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 321.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3753 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.