GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025
16 GB GDDR7, 70 Watt
34.28
+102%

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a whopping 102% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161342
Place by popularitynot in top-10060
Power efficiency37.3125.87
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGB206TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 August 2025 (recently)15 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43521024
Core clock speed790 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate265.299.84
Floating-point processing power16.97 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs13664
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length167 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1bNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.41.2.140
CUDA12.07.5
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 34.28
+102%
GTX 1650 Mobile 16.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 14363
+102%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+89.7%
58
−89.7%
1440p70−75
+89.2%
37
−89.2%
4K45−50
+95.7%
23
−95.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
God of War 47
+0%
47
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
God of War 38
+0%
38
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 164
+0%
164
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
God of War 32
+0%
32
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 148
+0%
148
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
God of War 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
+0%
71
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
+0%
72
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 159
+0%
159
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
God of War 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%
Valorant 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
God of War 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 90% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 89% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is 96% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.28 16.98
Recency 11 August 2025 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 50 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 101.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3712 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell or GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.