RTX A500 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Place in performance ranking	259	322
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	18.28	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	N18P-G62	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$892	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2048
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	1537 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)	60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	95.04	98.37

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and RTX A500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.16
+30.4%

RTX A500 Mobile 15.46

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms RTX A500 Mobile by 30% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+23.4%

RTX A500 Mobile 10748

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms RTX A500 Mobile by 23% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 +3.6%	56 −3.6%
1440p	44 +76%	25 −76%
4K	27 +50%	18−21 −50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

59
+146%

24−27

−146%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	61 +90.6%	30−35 −90.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +88.5%	24−27 −88.5%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +55.9%	30−35 −55.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +91.7%	24−27 −91.7%
Far Cry 5	69 +64.3%	40−45 −64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +95.3%	40−45 −95.3%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +26.9%	50−55 −26.9%
Hitman 3	83 +131%	35−40 −131%
Horizon Zero Dawn	115 +130%	50−55 −130%
Metro Exodus	91 +93.6%	45−50 −93.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95 +23.4%	77 −23.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60 +114%	27−30 −114%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	46 +43.8%	30−35 −43.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 +23.1%	24−27 −23.1%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	64 +88.2%	30−35 −88.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +50%	24−27 −50%
Far Cry 5	70 −5.7%	74 +5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	59 +37.2%	40−45 −37.2%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +26.9%	50−55 −26.9%
Hitman 3	45 +25%	35−40 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	91 +82%	50−55 −82%
Metro Exodus	62 +31.9%	45−50 −31.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 −2.4%	40−45 +2.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	62 +100%	31 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72 +125%	30−35 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	52 +85.7%	27−30 −85.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 −18.5%	30−35 +18.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 −9.7%	30−35 +9.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +41.7%	24−27 −41.7%
Far Cry 5	39 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +26.9%	50−55 −26.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	64 +28%	50−55 −28%
Metro Exodus	57 +21.3%	45−50 −21.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +21.9%	30−35 −21.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	22 −27.3%	27−30 +27.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−4.9%

40−45
+4.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +37.9%	27−30 −37.9%
Hitman 3	27 +22.7%	21−24 −22.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +36.8%	18−20 −36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +100%	8−9 −100%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +36%	24−27 −36%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +34.5%	27−30 −34.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +32.3%	30−35 −32.3%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +40.7%	27−30 −40.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +5.1%	39 −5.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	46 +39.4%	30−35 −39.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Hitman 3	16 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 +100%	9−10 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Battlefield 5	28 +75%	16−18 −75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +100%	3−4 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+28.6%

14−16

−28.6%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and RTX A500 Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 4% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 76% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 146% faster than the RTX A500 Mobile.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A500 Mobile is 73% faster than the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

All in all, in popular games: