RTX A1000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	268	219
Place by popularity	69	not in top-100
Power efficiency	28.17	28.74
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU116	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2048
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	630 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	1140 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	95.04	72.96
Floating-point processing power	3.041 TFLOPS	4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21

RTX A1000 Mobile 24.74
+22.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

RTX A1000 Mobile 9543
+22.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266

RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
+14.1%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517

RTX A1000 Mobile 58312
+34%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930

RTX A1000 Mobile 11321
+14%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163

RTX A1000 Mobile 70880
+8.8%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 3618

RTX A1000 Mobile 4256
+17.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58 −20.7%	70 +20.7%
1440p	42 +50%	28 −50%
4K	27 −11.1%	30−35 +11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−3.4%

61
+3.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	61 +19.6%	50−55 −19.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 −2%	50 +2%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −13.6%	75−80 +13.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +12.8%	45−50 −12.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −8.7%	50 +8.7%
Far Cry 5	69 +30.2%	50−55 −30.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +37.7%	60−65 −37.7%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −10.5%	130−140 +10.5%
Hitman 3	51 +10.9%	45−50 −10.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	181 +67.6%	100−110 −67.6%
Metro Exodus	91 +15.2%	75−80 −15.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 −38.6%	60−65 +38.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −14.9%	75−80 +14.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	201 +103%	95−100 −103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −13.3%	50−55 +13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 −3.1%	33 +3.1%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −13.6%	75−80 +13.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 −2.8%	37 +2.8%
Far Cry 5	58 +9.4%	50−55 −9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	59 −3.4%	60−65 +3.4%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −10.5%	130−140 +10.5%
Hitman 3	50 +8.7%	45−50 −8.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180 +66.7%	100−110 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	79 +0%	75−80 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 −56.4%	60−65 +56.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75 −16%	87 +16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	183 +84.8%	95−100 −84.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 −88.9%	50−55 +88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 −66.7%	25 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 −51.6%	45−50 +51.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +17.2%	29 −17.2%
Far Cry 5	39 −35.9%	50−55 +35.9%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −10.5%	130−140 +10.5%
Hitman 3	43 −7%	45−50 +7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	64 −68.8%	100−110 +68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 −20.6%	76 +20.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 −10.3%	43 +10.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	22 −18.2%	26 +18.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−48.8%

60−65
+48.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −12.8%	40−45 +12.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −22.2%	22 +22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −18.2%	24−27 +18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −15.9%	130−140 +15.9%
Hitman 3	28 +3.7%	27−30 −3.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −14.6%	45−50 +14.6%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −13.2%	40−45 +13.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −19.5%	45−50 +19.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −21.7%	27−30 +21.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120 −10%	130−140 +10%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−15.2%

35−40
+15.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Far Cry New Dawn	20 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Hitman 3	16 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 −183%	110−120 +183%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −18.2%	24−27 +18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	12 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −10.7%	30−35 +10.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−11.1%

20−22
+11.1%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A1000 Mobile is 21% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 50% faster in 1440p
RTX A1000 Mobile is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 103% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 183% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 19 tests (26%)
RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 51 test (71%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.21	24.74
Recency	23 April 2020	30 March 2022
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 22.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.