Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
16.63

Pro 5600M outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking326232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.1833.36
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1035 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate76.80164.8
Floating-point processing power2.458 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.63
Pro 5600M 23.93
+43.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6413
Pro 5600M 9232
+44%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD54
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
1440p35
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
4K25
−40%
35−40
+40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
−6.1%
50−55
+6.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−44.4%
75−80
+44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45
−8.9%
45−50
+8.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−40%
60−65
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−33%
140−150
+33%
Hitman 3 45
−6.7%
45−50
+6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−33.7%
110−120
+33.7%
Metro Exodus 86
+4.9%
80−85
−4.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−50%
80−85
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
+100%
100−110
−100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−36.8%
50−55
+36.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
−70.8%
40−45
+70.8%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−44.4%
75−80
+44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
−44.1%
45−50
+44.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−40%
60−65
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−33%
140−150
+33%
Hitman 3 43
−11.6%
45−50
+11.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−33.7%
110−120
+33.7%
Metro Exodus 66
−24.2%
80−85
+24.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 46
−37%
60−65
+37%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
−30.6%
80−85
+30.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−33.3%
50−55
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 193
+91.1%
100−110
−91.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−174%
50−55
+174%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−242%
40−45
+242%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
−123%
45−50
+123%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−33%
140−150
+33%
Hitman 3 38
−26.3%
45−50
+26.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
−94.7%
110−120
+94.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
−50%
80−85
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−62.5%
50−55
+62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
−531%
100−110
+531%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 46
−37%
60−65
+37%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−44%
35−40
+44%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−47.4%
27−30
+47.4%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−52.8%
130−140
+52.8%
Hitman 3 25
−12%
27−30
+12%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
−19.5%
45−50
+19.5%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−48.6%
50−55
+48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130
−4.6%
130−140
+4.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Hitman 3 14
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−44.7%
120−130
+44.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−30%
24−27
+30%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
−160%
12−14
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 39% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5600M is 43% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5600M is 40% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 100% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 531% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 68 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.63 23.93
Recency 2 April 2020 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm

Pro 5600M has a 43.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 208 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.