Radeon R9 M360 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with Radeon R9 M360, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
26.44
+460%

GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms R9 M360 by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking211651
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Power efficiency18.24no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Tropo
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280512
Compute unitsno data8
Core clock speed1530 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate138.029.60
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity-+
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.44
+460%
R9 M360 4.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10166
+461%
R9 M360 1813

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
+483%
12−14
−483%
1440p36
+500%
6−7
−500%
4K23
+475%
4−5
−475%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61
+510%
10−11
−510%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+530%
10−11
−530%
Elden Ring 76
+533%
12−14
−533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+471%
14−16
−471%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+500%
8−9
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+488%
8−9
−488%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+476%
21−24
−476%
Metro Exodus 89
+536%
14−16
−536%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+500%
14−16
−500%
Valorant 115
+539%
18−20
−539%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+471%
14−16
−471%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+550%
6−7
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+533%
6−7
−533%
Dota 2 138
+475%
24−27
−475%
Elden Ring 82
+486%
14−16
−486%
Far Cry 5 151
+529%
24−27
−529%
Fortnite 130−140
+519%
21−24
−519%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+461%
18−20
−461%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+472%
18−20
−472%
Metro Exodus 61
+510%
10−11
−510%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+504%
27−30
−504%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+500%
5−6
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
Valorant 100−110
+489%
18−20
−489%
World of Tanks 260−270
+484%
45−50
−484%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+471%
14−16
−471%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+483%
6−7
−483%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+540%
5−6
−540%
Dota 2 191
+537%
30−33
−537%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+464%
14−16
−464%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+493%
14−16
−493%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+504%
27−30
−504%
Valorant 100−110
+489%
18−20
−489%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
Elden Ring 31
+520%
5−6
−520%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+483%
30−33
−483%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
World of Tanks 170−180
+480%
30−33
−480%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+489%
9−10
−489%
Counter-Strike 2 20
+567%
3−4
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+550%
12−14
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 60
+500%
10−11
−500%
Metro Exodus 55
+511%
9−10
−511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+550%
6−7
−550%
Valorant 70−75
+500%
12−14
−500%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dota 2 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
Elden Ring 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
Metro Exodus 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+479%
14−16
−479%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+463%
8−9
−463%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5 0−1
Dota 2 80
+471%
14−16
−471%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Fortnite 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+500%
5−6
−500%
Valorant 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and R9 M360 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 483% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 500% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 475% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.44 4.72
Recency 22 November 2019 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

GTX 1650 SUPER has a 460.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M360 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Radeon R9 M360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon R9 M360
Radeon R9 M360

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4825 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 143 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.