Radeon HD 7870 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon HD 7870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
26.44
+120%

GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms HD 7870 by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking210407
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.00
Power efficiency18.244.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)5 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801280
Core clock speed1530 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate138.080.00
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s153.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.44
+120%
HD 7870 12.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10166
+120%
HD 7870 4620

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 SUPER 18225
+194%
HD 7870 6194

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 SUPER 64463
+202%
HD 7870 21348

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p180−190
+114%
84
−114%
Full HD70
+6.1%
66
−6.1%
1440p36
+125%
16−18
−125%
4K23
+130%
10−12
−130%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.29
1440pno data21.81
4Kno data34.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61
+177%
21−24
−177%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+174%
21−24
−174%
Elden Ring 76
+117%
35−40
−117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+105%
35−40
−105%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+118%
21−24
−118%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+104%
21−24
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+152%
45−50
−152%
Metro Exodus 89
+170%
30−35
−170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+171%
30−35
−171%
Valorant 115
+145%
45−50
−145%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+105%
35−40
−105%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+77.3%
21−24
−77.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+65.2%
21−24
−65.2%
Dota 2 138
+221%
40−45
−221%
Elden Ring 82
+134%
35−40
−134%
Far Cry 5 151
+221%
45−50
−221%
Fortnite 130−140
+88.4%
65−70
−88.4%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+110%
45−50
−110%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+140%
40−45
−140%
Metro Exodus 61
+84.8%
30−35
−84.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+81.1%
90−95
−81.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+142%
35−40
−142%
Valorant 100−110
+126%
45−50
−126%
World of Tanks 260−270
+58.4%
160−170
−58.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+105%
35−40
−105%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+59.1%
21−24
−59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+39.1%
21−24
−39.1%
Dota 2 191
+344%
40−45
−344%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+68.1%
45−50
−68.1%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+72.9%
45−50
−72.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+81.1%
90−95
−81.1%
Valorant 100−110
+126%
45−50
−126%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
+181%
16−18
−181%
Elden Ring 31
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+165%
16−18
−165%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+154%
65−70
−154%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
World of Tanks 170−180
+105%
85−90
−105%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+121%
24−27
−121%
Counter-Strike 2 20
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+189%
27−30
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 60
+114%
27−30
−114%
Metro Exodus 55
+120%
24−27
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+160%
14−16
−160%
Valorant 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Elden Ring 17
+113%
8−9
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Metro Exodus 16
+129%
7−8
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+105%
21−24
−105%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 80
+264%
21−24
−264%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+133%
14−16
−133%
Fortnite 30−35
+154%
12−14
−154%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Valorant 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and HD 7870 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 114% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 6% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 125% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 130% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 SUPER is 344% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 7870 is 3% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • HD 7870 is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.44 12.01
Recency 22 November 2019 5 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 175 Watt

GTX 1650 SUPER has a 120.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 75% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7870 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4821 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 644 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.