GeForce RTX 5090 vs GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce RTX 5090, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
25.24

RTX 5090 outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by a whopping 296% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2141
Place by popularity4859
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.28
Power efficiency18.2012.54
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU116GB202
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128021760
Core clock speed1530 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate138.01,637
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs32176
TMUs80680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length229 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.510.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 25.24
RTX 5090 100.00
+296%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10164
RTX 5090 40367
+297%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−196%
207
+196%
1440p36
−411%
184
+411%
4K23
−513%
141
+513%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data9.66
1440pno data10.86
4Kno data14.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61
−216%
190−200
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
−281%
240−250
+281%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−46.3%
110−120
+46.3%
Counter-Strike 2 48
−302%
190−200
+302%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
−283%
180−190
+283%
Forza Horizon 4 121
−272%
450−500
+272%
Forza Horizon 5 75
−203%
220−230
+203%
Metro Exodus 89
−82%
160−170
+82%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
−85.7%
150−160
+85.7%
Valorant 115
−337%
500−550
+337%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−46.3%
110−120
+46.3%
Counter-Strike 2 39
−395%
190−200
+395%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
−295%
150−160
+295%
Dota 2 138
−26.1%
170−180
+26.1%
Far Cry 5 151
−5.3%
159
+5.3%
Fortnite 130−140
−137%
300−350
+137%
Forza Horizon 4 101
−296%
400−450
+296%
Forza Horizon 5 75
−203%
220−230
+203%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
−288%
400−450
+288%
Metro Exodus 61
−166%
160−170
+166%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−31.9%
210−220
+31.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
−420%
150−160
+420%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−100%
170−180
+100%
Valorant 100−110
−375%
500−550
+375%
World of Tanks 260−270
−6.1%
270−280
+6.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−46.3%
110−120
+46.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35
−477%
202
+477%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
−275%
120−130
+275%
Dota 2 191
−293%
750−800
+293%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−96.2%
150−160
+96.2%
Forza Horizon 4 83
−261%
300−310
+261%
Forza Horizon 5 51
−345%
220−230
+345%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−31.9%
210−220
+31.9%
Valorant 100−110
−375%
500−550
+375%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
−249%
150−160
+249%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−278%
170−180
+278%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−291%
500−550
+291%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
−745%
90−95
+745%
World of Tanks 170−180
−197%
500−550
+197%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−64.2%
85−90
+64.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−295%
75−80
+295%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−103%
160−170
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 60
−283%
230−240
+283%
Forza Horizon 5 54
−222%
170−180
+222%
Metro Exodus 55
−160%
140−150
+160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−275%
150−160
+275%
Valorant 70−75
−475%
400−450
+475%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1640%
174
+1640%
Dota 2 45
−304%
180−190
+304%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−278%
170−180
+278%
Metro Exodus 16
−944%
167
+944%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−158%
200−210
+158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−276%
60−65
+276%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
−278%
170−180
+278%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−225%
90−95
+225%
Counter-Strike 2 2
−2650%
55
+2650%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−260%
18−20
+260%
Dota 2 80
−275%
300−310
+275%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−200%
100−110
+200%
Fortnite 30−35
−191%
95−100
+191%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−267%
110−120
+267%
Forza Horizon 5 39
−187%
110−120
+187%
Valorant 35−40
−594%
240−250
+594%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 183
+0%
183
+0%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 196% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 411% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 513% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5090 is 2650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is ahead in 44 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.24 100.00
Recency 22 November 2019 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 575 Watt

GTX 1650 SUPER has 475% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 296.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4865 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1499 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.