Arc Pro B50 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with Arc Pro B50, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
23.04

Pro B50 outperforms 1650 SUPER by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking258194
Place by popularity55not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.43
Power efficiency18.5634.32
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameTU116BMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802048
Core clock speed1530 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0332.8
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs80128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache1.3 MBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length229 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 SUPER 23.04
Arc Pro B50 29.82
+29.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10186
Samples: 6121
Arc Pro B50 13186
+29.5%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
−25%
85−90
+25%
1440p35
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
4K21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.11
1440pno data7.76
4Kno data12.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 248
−21%
300−310
+21%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
−27%
80−85
+27%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
−25%
90−95
+25%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 72
−25%
90−95
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 201
−29.4%
260−270
+29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−20%
60−65
+20%
Far Cry 5 93
−29%
120−130
+29%
Fortnite 120−130
−24%
150−160
+24%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Forza Horizon 5 93
−29%
120−130
+29%
Hogwarts Legacy 54
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−23.7%
120−130
+23.7%
Valorant 160−170
−24.3%
210−220
+24.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 58
−29.3%
75−80
+29.3%
Counter-Strike 2 96
−25%
120−130
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−15.4%
300−310
+15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−25%
50−55
+25%
Dota 2 209
−29.2%
270−280
+29.2%
Far Cry 5 86
−27.9%
110−120
+27.9%
Fortnite 120−130
−24%
150−160
+24%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Forza Horizon 5 82
−22%
100−105
+22%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
−26.2%
130−140
+26.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
−22%
50−55
+22%
Metro Exodus 51
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−23.7%
120−130
+23.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%
Valorant 160−170
−24.3%
210−220
+24.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 57
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
Dota 2 191
−25.7%
240−250
+25.7%
Far Cry 5 79
−26.6%
100−105
+26.6%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 33
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−23.7%
120−130
+23.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−20%
60−65
+20%
Valorant 160−170
−24.3%
210−220
+24.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
−24%
150−160
+24%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 52
−25%
65−70
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−25%
220−230
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Metro Exodus 29
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−25.7%
220−230
+25.7%
Valorant 200−210
−25.6%
260−270
+25.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 42
−19%
50−55
+19%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
Far Cry 5 54
−20.4%
65−70
+20.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−25%
80−85
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
−25%
75−80
+25%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−25%
40−45
+25%
Valorant 140−150
−23.3%
180−190
+23.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24
−25%
30−33
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 80
−25%
100−105
+25%
Far Cry 5 24
−25%
30−33
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and Arc Pro B50 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Pro B50 is 25% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Pro B50 is 29% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Pro B50 is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.04 29.82
Recency 22 November 2019 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt

Arc Pro B50 has a 29.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Arc Pro B50 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Intel Arc Pro B50
Arc Pro B50

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5300 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.