Arc A770M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and Arc A770M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
16.06

Arc A770M outperforms GTX 1650 Max-Q by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking342188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.9417.72
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU117DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244096
Core clock speed930 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate72.00524.8
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs64256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1751 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 16.06
Arc A770M 30.82
+91.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 6210
Arc A770M 11917
+91.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 11083
Arc A770M 37375
+237%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 30957
Arc A770M 77403
+150%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 7779
Arc A770M 25563
+229%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 45244
Arc A770M 124487
+175%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1650 Max-Q 3016
Arc A770M 10783
+258%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
−51.7%
91
+51.7%
1440p30
−70%
51
+70%
4K18
−111%
38
+111%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
−113%
80−85
+113%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−253%
113
+253%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
−113%
80−85
+113%
Battlefield 5 64
−70.3%
100−110
+70.3%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−197%
95
+197%
Far Cry 5 38
−179%
106
+179%
Fortnite 138
+2.2%
130−140
−2.2%
Forza Horizon 4 74
−52.7%
110−120
+52.7%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−105%
80−85
+105%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85
−35.3%
110−120
+35.3%
Valorant 120−130
−51.2%
180−190
+51.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
−113%
80−85
+113%
Battlefield 5 54
−102%
100−110
+102%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 167
−62.9%
270−280
+62.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−141%
77
+141%
Dota 2 94
−40.4%
130−140
+40.4%
Far Cry 5 35
−183%
99
+183%
Fortnite 80
−68.8%
130−140
+68.8%
Forza Horizon 4 69
−63.8%
110−120
+63.8%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−105%
80−85
+105%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
−53.6%
86
+53.6%
Metro Exodus 28
−232%
93
+232%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
−62%
110−120
+62%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−226%
173
+226%
Valorant 120−130
−51.2%
180−190
+51.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 49
−122%
100−110
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−114%
60−65
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−109%
67
+109%
Dota 2 88
−50%
130−140
+50%
Far Cry 5 33
−188%
95
+188%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−105%
110−120
+105%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−105%
80−85
+105%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
−117%
110−120
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−70%
51
+70%
Valorant 120−130
−51.2%
180−190
+51.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 59
−129%
130−140
+129%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−78.6%
200−210
+78.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−120%
55−60
+120%
Metro Exodus 16
−256%
57
+256%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−18.2%
170−180
+18.2%
Valorant 150−160
−45.5%
220−230
+45.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
−117%
75−80
+117%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−214%
44
+214%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−145%
81
+145%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−108%
75−80
+108%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−88.9%
50−55
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 36
−100%
70−75
+100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−60.7%
45
+60.7%
Metro Exodus 10
−270%
37
+270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−244%
62
+244%
Valorant 80−85
−108%
170−180
+108%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 19
−137%
45−50
+137%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−267%
22
+267%
Dota 2 50−55
−66.7%
90−95
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−181%
45
+181%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−123%
27−30
+123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
−94.1%
30−35
+94.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 11
−209%
30−35
+209%

This is how GTX 1650 Max-Q and Arc A770M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 52% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 70% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 111% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Max-Q is 2% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770M is 270% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • Arc A770M is ahead in 66 tests (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.06 30.82
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has 300% lower power consumption.

Arc A770M, on the other hand, has a 91.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 670 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 91 vote

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or Arc A770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.