Radeon RX 7900M vs GeForce GTX 1080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1080
2016
8 GB GDDR5X, 180 Watt
40.23

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1080 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9433
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.80no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code namePascal GP104Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2016 (8 years ago)19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data
Current price$241 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604608
CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1607 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt180 Watt (160 - 200 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate277.3601.9
Floating-point performance8,873 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 7900M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 40.23
RX 7900M 57.64
+43.3%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1080 by 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1080 15537
RX 7900M 22261
+43.3%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1080 by 43% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1080 29263
RX 7900M 59943
+105%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1080 by 105% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1080 21409
RX 7900M 50241
+135%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1080 by 135% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130
−11.5%
145
+11.5%
1440p76
−39.5%
106
+39.5%
4K61
−24.6%
76
+24.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75 no data
Battlefield 5 145 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 105 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Far Cry 5 123 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 135 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140 no data
Hitman 3 80−85 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 201 no data
Metro Exodus 144 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 114 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 83 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75 no data
Battlefield 5 128 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Far Cry 5 98 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 105 no data
Forza Horizon 4 291 no data
Hitman 3 80−85 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170 no data
Metro Exodus 119 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 108 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Far Cry 5 75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 112 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 121 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 105 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 89 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 90 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Far Cry 5 77 no data
Forza Horizon 4 93 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 92 no data
Metro Exodus 82 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 39 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 53 no data
Metro Exodus 47 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42 no data

This is how GTX 1080 and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 12% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 39% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.23 57.64
Recency 6 May 2016 19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4789 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 47 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.